<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><default:channel xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/"><title>Future Moocher - UK Web 2.0 &amp; Internet Trends</title><link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/</link><description>Moochings on the future of the net, community, classifieds, search, why American VCs always land on their feet and whatever else seems cool at the time.  Spotting hot web 2.0 trends for London and the UK, and keeping track of what Yahoo, Google, eBay and co are up to before it happens.</description><dc:language xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">en-UK</dc:language><admin:generatorAgent xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" rdf:resource="http://www.blog.co.uk"/><sy:updatePeriod xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">8</sy:updateFrequency><sy:updateBase xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2009/04/16/uk-property-revolution-going-strong-5956633/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2008/09/10/house-prices-uk-4709545/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/29/rightmove_to_fetch_p400m_at_ipo~515505/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/29/google_packs_another_microsoft_punch~515490/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/22/most_influential_brands_google_apple_sky~496263/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/22/2005_mergers_aamp_acquisitions_google_eb~496172/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/08/yahoo_uk_search_find_of_the_year_awards~451314/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/09/09/ebay_in_talks_to_buy_skype_why~170572/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/28/google_talk_skype_and_pay_per_call~147241/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/21/chomsky_and_the_philosophy_of_the_intern/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/11/rightmove_to_ipo/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/09/ny_times_to_invest_in_indeed_com/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/09/meetroduction_to_be_bought_by_google/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/07/vertical_search_aggregators_shaking_up_t/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/06/logogle_google_the_mind_goggles/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/06/welcome_to_future_moocher/"/></rdf:Seq></items></default:channel><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2009/04/16/uk-property-revolution-going-strong-5956633/"><default:title>UK property revolution going strong</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2009/04/16/uk-property-revolution-going-strong-5956633/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2009-04-16T21:29:50+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;Zoopla has been busy in recent weeks - and not 'just' with valuing 26m homes...&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Launched &lt;a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk"&gt;property for sale&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk/to-rent/"&gt;to rent&lt;/a&gt; listings&lt;br&gt;
New company &lt;a href="http://blog.zoopla.co.uk"&gt;property blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
1000+ followers on &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/zoopla"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Cool new &lt;a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk/links/"&gt;property widgets&lt;/a&gt; which you should definitely take advantage of if you run your own property or local site or blog.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2009/04/16/uk-property-revolution-going-strong-5956633/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>Zoopla has been busy in recent weeks - and not 'just' with valuing 26m homes...</p>
	<p>Launched <a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk">property for sale</a> and <a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk/to-rent/">to rent</a> listings<br>
New company <a href="http://blog.zoopla.co.uk">property blog</a><br>
1000+ followers on <a href="http://twitter.com/zoopla">Twitter</a><br>
Cool new <a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk/links/">property widgets</a> which you should definitely take advantage of if you run your own property or local site or blog.</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2009/04/16/uk-property-revolution-going-strong-5956633/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2008/09/10/house-prices-uk-4709545/"><default:title>House Prices and Estate Agents in the UK</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2008/09/10/house-prices-uk-4709545/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2008-09-10T18:52:08+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;One thing that continues to fascinate me on the web are the number of sites out there that are able to earn a very nice income for a one-man-band (or woman, but most of them seem to be guys) by re-publishing existing free or cheap data sources, driving traffic through SEO, and making money through ads - principally Google AdSense, which if optimised and prominent can earn around a $5 CPM.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;House prices is an area I look at a lot and there are at least 5 of these sites out there in the UK, buying the &lt;a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk/house-prices/"&gt;sold house prices&lt;/a&gt; England and Wales Land Registry data for a small fee, publishing to get traffic through SEO, then sending out the odd email newsletter to boost traffic to their AdSense pages.  However, in this case it looks like &lt;a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk"&gt;UK House Prices&lt;/a&gt; site Zoopla is set to take much of their property price search business away by adding value to the data, through their property valuation algorithm, free house price estimates and other richer content.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Another related SEO property data catalogue you find everywhere is that for estate agents.  There are around 15,000 &lt;a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk/estate-agents"&gt;estate agents in the UK&lt;/a&gt;, and so everyone from email4property to Zoopla to Rightmove to TouchLocal can generate agent SEO traffic - and even sell advertising or leads - by publishing a list of their contact details.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Other sectors where I see a lot of these AdSense entrepreneurs doing a great trade are business listings sites and directories, health sites like &lt;a href="http://www.fitandtrim.co.uk/calorie.html"&gt;free calorie counters&lt;/a&gt;, and sports sites.  Then there are those who take some initial database and add user-generated content and reviews - anything from classifieds to parenting to the thousands of niche forums out there.    &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;It seems what you need is a free or near-free database source with real search traffic and lots of SEO-friendly information.  I wonder what other databases there are out there worth re-publishing.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;I also wonder what sectors out there are doing "dumb" re-publishing like in house prices, where there is room for another Zoopla-style play that adds value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2008/09/10/house-prices-uk-4709545/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>One thing that continues to fascinate me on the web are the number of sites out there that are able to earn a very nice income for a one-man-band (or woman, but most of them seem to be guys) by re-publishing existing free or cheap data sources, driving traffic through SEO, and making money through ads - principally Google AdSense, which if optimised and prominent can earn around a $5 CPM.</p>
	<p>House prices is an area I look at a lot and there are at least 5 of these sites out there in the UK, buying the <a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk/house-prices/">sold house prices</a> England and Wales Land Registry data for a small fee, publishing to get traffic through SEO, then sending out the odd email newsletter to boost traffic to their AdSense pages.  However, in this case it looks like <a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk">UK House Prices</a> site Zoopla is set to take much of their property price search business away by adding value to the data, through their property valuation algorithm, free house price estimates and other richer content.</p>
	<p>Another related SEO property data catalogue you find everywhere is that for estate agents.  There are around 15,000 <a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk/estate-agents">estate agents in the UK</a>, and so everyone from email4property to Zoopla to Rightmove to TouchLocal can generate agent SEO traffic - and even sell advertising or leads - by publishing a list of their contact details.</p>
	<p>Other sectors where I see a lot of these AdSense entrepreneurs doing a great trade are business listings sites and directories, health sites like <a href="http://www.fitandtrim.co.uk/calorie.html">free calorie counters</a>, and sports sites.  Then there are those who take some initial database and add user-generated content and reviews - anything from classifieds to parenting to the thousands of niche forums out there.    </p>
	<p>It seems what you need is a free or near-free database source with real search traffic and lots of SEO-friendly information.  I wonder what other databases there are out there worth re-publishing.</p>
	<p>I also wonder what sectors out there are doing "dumb" re-publishing like in house prices, where there is room for another Zoopla-style play that adds value.</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2008/09/10/house-prices-uk-4709545/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/29/rightmove_to_fetch_p400m_at_ipo~515505/"><default:title>Rightmove to fetch £400M at IPO?</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/29/rightmove_to_fetch_p400m_at_ipo~515505/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2006-01-29T09:49:27+01:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://offlinehbpl.hbpl.co.uk//news/RB/537935_1.jpg" alt="Rightmove" title="Rightmove"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;I wrote a &lt;a href="http://www.blog.co.uk/index.php/dougall/2005/08/11/rightmove_to_ipo"&gt;long post&lt;/a&gt; about &lt;a href="http://www.rightmove.co.uk"&gt;Rightmove&lt;/a&gt;'s IPO back in August.  It now looks like with the crazy bubble in UK classifieds it may fetch as much as £400M in a spring offering.  That will make struggling owners like Countrywide very happy - in fact their stake in Rightmove could be as much as 20% of their current market cap.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;This bubble has seen the UK media companies, scared witless of online eating their lunch, buying up the likes of &lt;a href="http://www.findaproperty.com"&gt;findaproperty&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.primelocation.com"&gt;primelocation&lt;/a&gt; for some very generous valuations over the last 18 months.  But at £400M (at least 50x 2006 earnings), Rightmove is &lt;a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/bulletins/br/article/537935/dotcom-fever-takes-rightmove-newspaper-groups-reach/"&gt;probably too steep for them&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Rightmove is a clear number one - as Alexa shows - but how much of this is due to expensive TV campaigns and its closed relationship with its estate agent owners?&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://traffic.alexa.com/graph?w=379&amp;h=216&amp;r=1y&amp;y=r&amp;u=rightmove.co.uk/&amp;u=findaproperty.com&amp;u=primelocation.com" alt="Rightmove traffic lead" title="Rightmove traffic lead"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;It will be great - if they do make it to IPO without a scared media baron diving in - to have another UK internet stock.  Although not a very sexy one.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;PS 2 years on - check out Zoopla for &lt;a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk"&gt;House prices and UK property value estimates&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/29/rightmove_to_fetch_p400m_at_ipo~515505/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p><img src="http://offlinehbpl.hbpl.co.uk//news/RB/537935_1.jpg" alt="Rightmove" title="Rightmove"></p>
	<p>I wrote a <a href="http://www.blog.co.uk/index.php/dougall/2005/08/11/rightmove_to_ipo">long post</a> about <a href="http://www.rightmove.co.uk">Rightmove</a>'s IPO back in August.  It now looks like with the crazy bubble in UK classifieds it may fetch as much as £400M in a spring offering.  That will make struggling owners like Countrywide very happy - in fact their stake in Rightmove could be as much as 20% of their current market cap.</p>
	<p>This bubble has seen the UK media companies, scared witless of online eating their lunch, buying up the likes of <a href="http://www.findaproperty.com">findaproperty</a> and <a href="http://www.primelocation.com">primelocation</a> for some very generous valuations over the last 18 months.  But at £400M (at least 50x 2006 earnings), Rightmove is <a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/bulletins/br/article/537935/dotcom-fever-takes-rightmove-newspaper-groups-reach/">probably too steep for them</a>.</p>
	<p>Rightmove is a clear number one - as Alexa shows - but how much of this is due to expensive TV campaigns and its closed relationship with its estate agent owners?</p>
	<p><img src="http://traffic.alexa.com/graph?w=379&h=216&r=1y&y=r&u=rightmove.co.uk/&u=findaproperty.com&u=primelocation.com" alt="Rightmove traffic lead" title="Rightmove traffic lead"></p>
	<p>It will be great - if they do make it to IPO without a scared media baron diving in - to have another UK internet stock.  Although not a very sexy one.</p>
	<p>PS 2 years on - check out Zoopla for <a href="http://www.zoopla.co.uk">House prices and UK property value estimates</a>
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/29/rightmove_to_fetch_p400m_at_ipo~515505/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/29/google_packs_another_microsoft_punch~515490/"><default:title>Google packs another Microsoft punch?</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/29/google_packs_another_microsoft_punch~515490/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2006-01-29T09:31:45+01:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://pack.google.com/images/bundle_sm.gif" alt="Google is packing" title="Google is packing"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://pack.google.com/"&gt;Google Pack&lt;/a&gt; looks like a very useful software bundle.  It also looks like one step nearer a complete desktop solution, which if I was Bill Gates would make me very fidgety indeed.  Adobe, RealNetworks, Norton, Lavasoft - also a list of the few viable software companies Microsoft never gobbled up, sidling up to Google.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;This, along with the &lt;a href="http://www.google.co.uk/ig?hl=en"&gt;My Google stealth programme&lt;/a&gt;, forcing me to merge my different Google accounts and tenaciously remembering my postcode / zipcode, smells like another step in the Google Gets Evil plan.  Google hasn't been so good at integrating all its different cool products and ideas, or at giving each user a single view of all their Google options.  That's changing, fast.  Google is packing.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/29/google_packs_another_microsoft_punch~515490/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p><img src="http://pack.google.com/images/bundle_sm.gif" alt="Google is packing" title="Google is packing"></p>
	<p><a href="http://pack.google.com/">Google Pack</a> looks like a very useful software bundle.  It also looks like one step nearer a complete desktop solution, which if I was Bill Gates would make me very fidgety indeed.  Adobe, RealNetworks, Norton, Lavasoft - also a list of the few viable software companies Microsoft never gobbled up, sidling up to Google.</p>
	<p>This, along with the <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/ig?hl=en">My Google stealth programme</a>, forcing me to merge my different Google accounts and tenaciously remembering my postcode / zipcode, smells like another step in the Google Gets Evil plan.  Google hasn't been so good at integrating all its different cool products and ideas, or at giving each user a single view of all their Google options.  That's changing, fast.  Google is packing.
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/29/google_packs_another_microsoft_punch~515490/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/22/most_influential_brands_google_apple_sky~496263/"><default:title>Most influential brands: Google, Apple, Skype, Firefox, Bono?</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/22/most_influential_brands_google_apple_sky~496263/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2006-01-22T19:51:46+01:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://brandchannel.com"&gt;Brandchannel.com&lt;/a&gt; just released their most influential brands of 2005.  No surprise: Google top (GGE &lt;img src="/img/smilies/icon_censored.gif" alt="&gt;:XX" class="middle" border="0"&gt;).  Apple second.  But &lt;a href="http://www.skype.com"&gt;Skype&lt;/a&gt; third is more surprising and pretty cool if you own stock in eBay like me ;-)  Clearly this was voted for by cool, slightly-but-not-too tekky media and advertising folk.  But it's still thought-provoking.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;You can see the full rankings &lt;a href="http://www.brandchannel.com/start1.asp?fa_id=298"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Interesting how branding ain't that global; that &lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk"&gt;BBC&lt;/a&gt; is a big brand (government owned after all); &lt;a href="http://www.nokia.com"&gt;Nokia&lt;/a&gt; still top in Europe despite a shaky year; &lt;a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&amp;id=124729&amp;t=59"&gt;Firefox&lt;/a&gt; is top ten; and &lt;a href="http://craigslist.org"&gt;craigslist&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.wholefoods.com"&gt;Wholefoods&lt;/a&gt; (used to be my local in Evanston) continuing to make waves in the US.  Bono is also a global brand apparently, sounds like a brand of dog food to me &lt;img src="/img/smilies/icon_idea.gif" alt=":idea:" class="middle" border="0"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&amp;id=124729&amp;t=59"&gt;&lt;img border="0" alt="Get Firefox!" title="Get Firefox!" src="http://sfx-images.mozilla.org/affiliates/Buttons/180x60/safer.gif"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/22/most_influential_brands_google_apple_sky~496263/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://brandchannel.com">Brandchannel.com</a> just released their most influential brands of 2005.  No surprise: Google top (GGE <img src="/img/smilies/icon_censored.gif" alt=">:XX" class="middle" border="0">).  Apple second.  But <a href="http://www.skype.com">Skype</a> third is more surprising and pretty cool if you own stock in eBay like me ;-)  Clearly this was voted for by cool, slightly-but-not-too tekky media and advertising folk.  But it's still thought-provoking.</p>
	<p>You can see the full rankings <a href="http://www.brandchannel.com/start1.asp?fa_id=298">here</a></p>
	<p>Interesting how branding ain't that global; that <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">BBC</a> is a big brand (government owned after all); <a href="http://www.nokia.com">Nokia</a> still top in Europe despite a shaky year; <a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=124729&t=59">Firefox</a> is top ten; and <a href="http://craigslist.org">craigslist</a> and <a href="http://www.wholefoods.com">Wholefoods</a> (used to be my local in Evanston) continuing to make waves in the US.  Bono is also a global brand apparently, sounds like a brand of dog food to me <img src="/img/smilies/icon_idea.gif" alt=":idea:" class="middle" border="0"></p>
	<p><a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=124729&t=59"><img border="0" alt="Get Firefox!" title="Get Firefox!" src="http://sfx-images.mozilla.org/affiliates/Buttons/180x60/safer.gif"></a>
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/22/most_influential_brands_google_apple_sky~496263/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/22/2005_mergers_aamp_acquisitions_google_eb~496172/"><default:title>2005 Mergers &amp; Acquisitions: Google, eBay, Yahoo, NewsCorp etc</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/22/2005_mergers_aamp_acquisitions_google_eb~496172/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2006-01-22T19:28:35+01:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;Great &lt;a href="http://the-web-review.blogspot.com/2006/01/acquisitions-mergers.html"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; by Adam Mills in &lt;a href="http://the-web-review.blogspot.com"&gt;The Web Review&lt;/a&gt; listing 2005 Acquisitions by &lt;a href="http://www.google.com"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.ebay.com"&gt;eBay&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.yahoo.com"&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.iac.com"&gt;IAC&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.aol.com"&gt;AOL&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.newscorp.com"&gt;NewsCorp&lt;/a&gt; etc in the web 2.0 space, including &lt;a href="http://www.urchin.com"&gt;Urchin&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com"&gt;Flickr&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://blo.gs"&gt;Blo.gs&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.gumtree.com"&gt;Gumtree&lt;/a&gt; etc&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Urchin looks like a real bargain for Google at $30M, they have decimated the competition and really added to their webmaster suite of services by making it free and calling it Google Analytics!  Smart move, although demand has overwhelmed them I think and it could be another step in the GGE campaign (Google Gets Evil).&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Other transactions worth looking at in 2005 from a UK perspective include old line media company purchases of classifieds sites like smartnewhomes, primelocation, findaproperty in real estate and also in jobs.  These guys are one step behind though.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Anyone got any interesting info on the "undisclosed" transaction amounts?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/22/2005_mergers_aamp_acquisitions_google_eb~496172/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>Great <a href="http://the-web-review.blogspot.com/2006/01/acquisitions-mergers.html">post</a> by Adam Mills in <a href="http://the-web-review.blogspot.com">The Web Review</a> listing 2005 Acquisitions by <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a>, <a href="http://www.ebay.com">eBay</a>, <a href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo</a>, <a href="http://www.iac.com">IAC</a>, <a href="http://www.aol.com">AOL</a>, <a href="http://www.newscorp.com">NewsCorp</a> etc in the web 2.0 space, including <a href="http://www.urchin.com">Urchin</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com">Flickr</a>, <a href="http://blo.gs">Blo.gs</a>, <a href="http://www.gumtree.com">Gumtree</a> etc</p>
	<p>Urchin looks like a real bargain for Google at $30M, they have decimated the competition and really added to their webmaster suite of services by making it free and calling it Google Analytics!  Smart move, although demand has overwhelmed them I think and it could be another step in the GGE campaign (Google Gets Evil).</p>
	<p>Other transactions worth looking at in 2005 from a UK perspective include old line media company purchases of classifieds sites like smartnewhomes, primelocation, findaproperty in real estate and also in jobs.  These guys are one step behind though.</p>
	<p>Anyone got any interesting info on the "undisclosed" transaction amounts?</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/22/2005_mergers_aamp_acquisitions_google_eb~496172/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/08/yahoo_uk_search_find_of_the_year_awards~451314/"><default:title>Yahoo UK Search "Find of the Year" Awards 2005</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/08/yahoo_uk_search_find_of_the_year_awards~451314/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2006-01-08T13:32:51+01:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;Just a big ad for Yahoo or an interesting independent assessment of the best of UK web 2.0 in 2005?  If this is the best innovation our Venture Capital, blogging and entrepreneurial community can deliver, it may be time to quit now!&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;I found out this week that &lt;a href="http://www.gumtree.com"&gt;Gumtree&lt;/a&gt; had been nominated for best Community site in these awards.  My first task then is to ask you to please vote for Gumtree as the &lt;a href="http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/scp/viewer/index.php?client_id=2997&amp;event_id=16404"&gt;People's Choice&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Plug over.  Now some observations on the state of the UK web from the other Community nominations:&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.candoexchange.org/exchange"&gt;Can Do Exchange&lt;/a&gt; - freecycle meets keen.com.  "Service" exchanges and marketplaces have been tried for the last 10 years, everyone thinks they're a great idea and yet they never work big time.  Not much traction for this one yet either.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.londonist.com/"&gt;Londonist&lt;/a&gt; - part of &lt;a href="http://www.gothamistllc.com/"&gt;Gothamist&lt;/a&gt;, a "worldwide" network of city blog sites, trying to become the blogger version of the Metro I guess.  Interesting global-local twist, but I didn't find it sticky.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/"&gt;Flickr&lt;/a&gt; - hardly fair for Yahoo to nominate their own global photo-sharing community web2.0 tagging phenomenon as the UK's best community site.  It is damned good though.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.treasuremytext.com"&gt;Treasure My Text&lt;/a&gt; - The next killer storage application?  A huge base to expand into mobile services?  Or the world's most rambling collection of horribly misspelt haikus?&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;The other categories - entertainment, celebrity, tv and travel etc don't pique my interest so much.  They're OK for an idle Friday afternoon I suppose but hardly original. Just a couple of favourites that buck the trend:&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.futureme.org/"&gt;Future Me&lt;/a&gt; - Utility to send yourself/others email in the future.  Maybe to make your boss think you're working when on holiday?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.liveplasma.com/"&gt;Live Plasma&lt;/a&gt; - Mind maps of music, movies and stuff you like, so you can find more like it.  Integrate this with &lt;a href="http://www.myspace.com"&gt;MySpace&lt;/a&gt; or similar music communities and you are getting into truly coooooolll-land.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Come on UK bloggers, VCs and webtrepreneurs - I wanna see us leading the US next year, not presenting this miserable cluster of half-innovation.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Yahoo" rel="tag"&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/flickr" rel="tag"&gt;Flickr&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/UK" rel="tag"&gt;UK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/London" rel="tag"&gt;London&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/community" rel="tag"&gt;community&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/awards" rel="tag"&gt;Awards&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web2.0" rel="tag"&gt;Web2.0&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/08/yahoo_uk_search_find_of_the_year_awards~451314/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>Just a big ad for Yahoo or an interesting independent assessment of the best of UK web 2.0 in 2005?  If this is the best innovation our Venture Capital, blogging and entrepreneurial community can deliver, it may be time to quit now!</p>
	<p>I found out this week that <a href="http://www.gumtree.com">Gumtree</a> had been nominated for best Community site in these awards.  My first task then is to ask you to please vote for Gumtree as the <a href="http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/scp/viewer/index.php?client_id=2997&event_id=16404">People's Choice</a>.</p>
	<p>Plug over.  Now some observations on the state of the UK web from the other Community nominations:</p>
	<p><a href="http://www.candoexchange.org/exchange">Can Do Exchange</a> - freecycle meets keen.com.  "Service" exchanges and marketplaces have been tried for the last 10 years, everyone thinks they're a great idea and yet they never work big time.  Not much traction for this one yet either.<br>
<a href="http://www.londonist.com/">Londonist</a> - part of <a href="http://www.gothamistllc.com/">Gothamist</a>, a "worldwide" network of city blog sites, trying to become the blogger version of the Metro I guess.  Interesting global-local twist, but I didn't find it sticky.<br>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/">Flickr</a> - hardly fair for Yahoo to nominate their own global photo-sharing community web2.0 tagging phenomenon as the UK's best community site.  It is damned good though.<br>
<a href="http://www.treasuremytext.com">Treasure My Text</a> - The next killer storage application?  A huge base to expand into mobile services?  Or the world's most rambling collection of horribly misspelt haikus?</p>
	<p>The other categories - entertainment, celebrity, tv and travel etc don't pique my interest so much.  They're OK for an idle Friday afternoon I suppose but hardly original. Just a couple of favourites that buck the trend:</p>
	<p><a href="http://www.futureme.org/">Future Me</a> - Utility to send yourself/others email in the future.  Maybe to make your boss think you're working when on holiday?<br>
<a href="http://www.liveplasma.com/">Live Plasma</a> - Mind maps of music, movies and stuff you like, so you can find more like it.  Integrate this with <a href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a> or similar music communities and you are getting into truly coooooolll-land.</p>
	<p>Come on UK bloggers, VCs and webtrepreneurs - I wanna see us leading the US next year, not presenting this miserable cluster of half-innovation.</p>
	<p><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Yahoo" rel="tag">Yahoo</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/flickr" rel="tag">Flickr</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/UK" rel="tag">UK</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/London" rel="tag">London</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/community" rel="tag">community</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/awards" rel="tag">Awards</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web2.0" rel="tag">Web2.0</a>
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2006/01/08/yahoo_uk_search_find_of_the_year_awards~451314/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/09/09/ebay_in_talks_to_buy_skype_why~170572/"><default:title>eBay in talks to buy Skype: why?</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/09/09/ebay_in_talks_to_buy_skype_why~170572/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2005-09-09T08:13:59+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;Lots of &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB112615385922335028,00.html"&gt;rumours about&lt;/a&gt; and a rich price tag for a company with &lt;a href="http://gigaom.com/2005/09/07/skype%e2%80%99s-anunal-revenue-over-72-million-maybe/"&gt;$70M in revenue&lt;/a&gt;.  Most people &lt;a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2005/09/ebay_and_skype.html"&gt;don't get it&lt;/a&gt;, hence a dip in eBay's stock.  Why?&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;This would be a fascinating development in the context of my last post on &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/talk/"&gt;Google Talk&lt;/a&gt; and pay per call.  &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;It could bring &lt;a href="http://www.ebay.com"&gt;eBay&lt;/a&gt; into even more direct competition with &lt;a href="http://www.google.com"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.yahoo.com"&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt; as a forum for small business advertisers too.  A lot of people are talking about customer service benefits for eBay - there's also a huge P2P network,a micropayments play and a pay per call ad network play.  eBay is in the business of attracting massive consumer audiences, enabling transactions and charging businesses for access to them - so is Skype, PayPal, shopping.com and incidentally so is Google.  eBay didn't buy Google 5 years ago when it could have; perhaps they will not repeat the mistake.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Google" rel="tag"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Skype" rel="tag"&gt;Skype&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/eBay" rel="tag"&gt;eBay&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/VoIP" rel="tag"&gt;VoIP&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/paypercall" rel="tag"&gt;paypercall&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/09/09/ebay_in_talks_to_buy_skype_why~170572/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>Lots of <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB112615385922335028,00.html">rumours about</a> and a rich price tag for a company with <a href="http://gigaom.com/2005/09/07/skype%e2%80%99s-anunal-revenue-over-72-million-maybe/">$70M in revenue</a>.  Most people <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2005/09/ebay_and_skype.html">don't get it</a>, hence a dip in eBay's stock.  Why?</p>
	<p>This would be a fascinating development in the context of my last post on <a href="http://www.google.com/talk/">Google Talk</a> and pay per call.  </p>
	<p>It could bring <a href="http://www.ebay.com">eBay</a> into even more direct competition with <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> and <a href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo</a> as a forum for small business advertisers too.  A lot of people are talking about customer service benefits for eBay - there's also a huge P2P network,a micropayments play and a pay per call ad network play.  eBay is in the business of attracting massive consumer audiences, enabling transactions and charging businesses for access to them - so is Skype, PayPal, shopping.com and incidentally so is Google.  eBay didn't buy Google 5 years ago when it could have; perhaps they will not repeat the mistake.</p>
	<p><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Google" rel="tag">Google</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Skype" rel="tag">Skype</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/eBay" rel="tag">eBay</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/VoIP" rel="tag">VoIP</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/paypercall" rel="tag">paypercall</a>
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/09/09/ebay_in_talks_to_buy_skype_why~170572/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/28/google_talk_skype_and_pay_per_call~147241/"><default:title>Google Talk, Skype, Yahoo and Pay-per-call</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/28/google_talk_skype_and_pay_per_call~147241/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2005-08-28T13:22:03+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;The net has gone crazy this week with hype about &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/talk/"&gt;Google Talk&lt;/a&gt;, Google's newly announced and released Instant Messenging / Voice over IP product.  But some big implications have not been picked up widely: open IM networks and &lt;a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3484621"&gt;pay-per-call&lt;/a&gt; voice advertising.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.google.com/talk/images/talk_logo.gif" alt="Google Talk" title="Google Talk"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Yes, Google wants to compete with the hype that is &lt;a href="http://www.skype.com"&gt;Skype&lt;/a&gt;.  Yes, it is making a direct competitive play with &lt;a href="http://www.msn.co.uk"&gt;MSN&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.yahoo.co.uk"&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.aol.co.uk"&gt;AOL&lt;/a&gt;'s millions of installed instant messenging customers.  And in both segments, it's coming from behind.  Yes, it can sell ads on Google talk.  But this is all "me too".&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Voice over IP is the future.  In fact, it's pretty much here now.  The problem is, there's not much cash in these consumer-to-consumer calls: worldwide prices are falling anyway, and while the pure-plays can beat &lt;a href="http://www.bt.com"&gt;British Telecom&lt;/a&gt; on cost structure, at the end of the day it's a commodity product.  Although it would be kind of cool / scary to be able to Google search your phone calls ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;The first really interesting implication for me is around open networks - Google is using &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Messaging_and_Presence_Protocol"&gt;XMPP&lt;/a&gt;, an open source, XML-based protocol which could in theory open up the various instant messenging networks to each other, something that Yahoo/MSN/AOL have resisted.  Whether it will succeed in getting these opened remains to be seen.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;The second is around advertising and in particular pay-per-call.  The reason that Google and Overture exist as businesses is performance-based, pay-per click online advertising.  I pay you to deliver a customer to my site.  But still 90% of businesses would pay more for a phone call than a click.  As an estate agent, car dealer or plumber, do I really care about clicks?  Calls are much more valuable, and I'll pay more for them.  Although it's early days and the business models are still evolving, start-ups like &lt;a href="http://paypercall.ingenio.com/default.aspx"&gt;Ingenio&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.estara.com/"&gt;eStara&lt;/a&gt; are proving this.  Try a search for &lt;a href="http://www.aolsearch.com/aolcom/search?invocationType=topsearchbox.search&amp;query=mortgage+california"&gt;"mortgage california" on AOLsearch&lt;/a&gt; and look at the &lt;a href="http://aol.call.ingenio.com/Listings/Details.aspx?NUM=a%3a5599306%3a22%3a2741103%3a14%3a831%3a4&amp;q=mortgage+california"&gt;Ernest Loans ad&lt;/a&gt; that comes up from Ingenio to see what I mean.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Google or Skype's voice network and millions of voice users, could be a huge strategic asset in pay-per-call for the next wave of online advertising, integrating web and voice.  &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Yahoo has &lt;a href="http://www.netimperative.com/2005/08/10/Yahoo_pay_per_call"&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; that it has just started trialling eStara's pay-per-call solution on Yahoo cars UK and soon on &lt;a href="http://www.kelkoo.co.uk"&gt;Kelkoo&lt;/a&gt; too.  This one slipped by with little notice, but is almost as significant in showing how the next leap in advertising's getting closer.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Is Google becoming evil?  Maybe.  Are they scatterbraining into lots of random industry areas without any strategic sense?  In this case, probably not.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Google" rel="tag"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Skype" rel="tag"&gt;Skype&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Yahoo" rel="tag"&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Ingenio" rel="tag"&gt;Ingenio&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/eStara" rel="tag"&gt;eStara&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/VoIP" rel="tag"&gt;VoIP&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/paypercall" rel="tag"&gt;paypercall&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/28/google_talk_skype_and_pay_per_call~147241/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>The net has gone crazy this week with hype about <a href="http://www.google.com/talk/">Google Talk</a>, Google's newly announced and released Instant Messenging / Voice over IP product.  But some big implications have not been picked up widely: open IM networks and <a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3484621">pay-per-call</a> voice advertising.</p>
	<p><img src="http://www.google.com/talk/images/talk_logo.gif" alt="Google Talk" title="Google Talk"></p>
	<p>Yes, Google wants to compete with the hype that is <a href="http://www.skype.com">Skype</a>.  Yes, it is making a direct competitive play with <a href="http://www.msn.co.uk">MSN</a>, <a href="http://www.yahoo.co.uk">Yahoo</a> and <a href="http://www.aol.co.uk">AOL</a>'s millions of installed instant messenging customers.  And in both segments, it's coming from behind.  Yes, it can sell ads on Google talk.  But this is all "me too".</p>
	<p>Voice over IP is the future.  In fact, it's pretty much here now.  The problem is, there's not much cash in these consumer-to-consumer calls: worldwide prices are falling anyway, and while the pure-plays can beat <a href="http://www.bt.com">British Telecom</a> on cost structure, at the end of the day it's a commodity product.  Although it would be kind of cool / scary to be able to Google search your phone calls ;-)</p>
	<p>The first really interesting implication for me is around open networks - Google is using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Messaging_and_Presence_Protocol">XMPP</a>, an open source, XML-based protocol which could in theory open up the various instant messenging networks to each other, something that Yahoo/MSN/AOL have resisted.  Whether it will succeed in getting these opened remains to be seen.</p>
	<p>The second is around advertising and in particular pay-per-call.  The reason that Google and Overture exist as businesses is performance-based, pay-per click online advertising.  I pay you to deliver a customer to my site.  But still 90% of businesses would pay more for a phone call than a click.  As an estate agent, car dealer or plumber, do I really care about clicks?  Calls are much more valuable, and I'll pay more for them.  Although it's early days and the business models are still evolving, start-ups like <a href="http://paypercall.ingenio.com/default.aspx">Ingenio</a> and <a href="http://www.estara.com/">eStara</a> are proving this.  Try a search for <a href="http://www.aolsearch.com/aolcom/search?invocationType=topsearchbox.search&query=mortgage+california">"mortgage california" on AOLsearch</a> and look at the <a href="http://aol.call.ingenio.com/Listings/Details.aspx?NUM=a%3a5599306%3a22%3a2741103%3a14%3a831%3a4&q=mortgage+california">Ernest Loans ad</a> that comes up from Ingenio to see what I mean.</p>
	<p>Google or Skype's voice network and millions of voice users, could be a huge strategic asset in pay-per-call for the next wave of online advertising, integrating web and voice.  </p>
	<p>Yahoo has <a href="http://www.netimperative.com/2005/08/10/Yahoo_pay_per_call">announced</a> that it has just started trialling eStara's pay-per-call solution on Yahoo cars UK and soon on <a href="http://www.kelkoo.co.uk">Kelkoo</a> too.  This one slipped by with little notice, but is almost as significant in showing how the next leap in advertising's getting closer.</p>
	<p>Is Google becoming evil?  Maybe.  Are they scatterbraining into lots of random industry areas without any strategic sense?  In this case, probably not.</p>
	<p><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Google" rel="tag">Google</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Skype" rel="tag">Skype</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Yahoo" rel="tag">Yahoo</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Ingenio" rel="tag">Ingenio</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/eStara" rel="tag">eStara</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/VoIP" rel="tag">VoIP</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/paypercall" rel="tag">paypercall</a></p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/28/google_talk_skype_and_pay_per_call~147241/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/21/chomsky_and_the_philosophy_of_the_intern/"><default:title>Chomsky and the Philosophy of the Internet Revolution</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/21/chomsky_and_the_philosophy_of_the_intern/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2005-08-21T12:08:38+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;The net, peer to peer technologies like &lt;a href="http://www.napster.com/"&gt;Napster&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.bittorrent.com/"&gt;BitTorrent&lt;/a&gt;, social networking, blogging, podcasting, &lt;a href="http://www.ebay.co.uk"&gt;eBay&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.gumtree.com"&gt;classifieds&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.zopa.com"&gt;zopa&lt;/a&gt;. They don't just destroy old industries and ways of doing things from a commercial perspective, they break down the controlled, centralised 1950s ways of thinking.  This culture has been dominated in the last 50 years by (in most western countries) a national media lacking in diversity, an apathetic and materialistic middle class and governments often more beholden to corporations and political donors than voters.  &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;But the net starts to break this down.  Witness the rumblings about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan or US elections.  Witness the breadth of "news media" replacement perspectives on the &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/London+Bomb"&gt;London bombings&lt;/a&gt; reported in blogs and through passers-by &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/bomb/pool/"&gt;taking pictures&lt;/a&gt; on their mobile phones.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;In this vein, I was struck how some of what &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky"&gt;Noam Chomsky&lt;/a&gt; had to say on propaganda and the limits of freedom of expression in the west could apply to the (past, present and) future of the net, while reading &lt;a href="http://www.chomsky.info/"&gt;some of his old essays&lt;/a&gt; on the &lt;a href="http://www.icelandair.com"&gt;plane&lt;/a&gt; while on vacation.  This stuff was written in 1970, much of it in response to the Cold War, but is just as true today:&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;"We have, perhaps, reached a point in history when it is possible to think seriously about a society in which freely constituted social bonds replace the fetters of autocratic institutions ...&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Predatory capitalism created a complex industrial system and an advanced technology; it permitted a considerable extension of democratic practice and fostered certain liberal values, but within limits that are now being pressed and must be overcome.  It is not a fit system for the mid-twentieth century.  It is incapable of meeting human needs that can be expressed only in collective terms, and its concept of a competitive man who seeks only to maximize wealth and power, who subjects himself to market relationships, to exploitation and external authority, is antihuman and intolerable in the deepest sense.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;An autocratic state is no acceptable substitute; nor can the militarized state capitalism evolving in the United States or the bureaucratized, centralized welfare state be accepted as the goal of human existence ...&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Modern science and technology can relieve people of the necessity for specialized, imbecile labor.  They may, in principle, provide the basis for a rational social order based on free association and democratic control, if we have the will to create it."&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Language and Freedom, 1970&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;You have to remember that I was in rainy &lt;a href="http://www.dougandkim.co.uk/photos/iceland.html"&gt;Iceland&lt;/a&gt;, denied pretty much all access to the net and therefore forced to read a real book for a change: very productive!  Maybe this should happen more often.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;A philosophical grounding for web 2.0?  Viva the revolution (or is it the evolution)!&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Chomsky" rel="tag"&gt;Chomsky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web2.0" rel="tag"&gt;web2.0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web 2.0" rel="tag"&gt;web 2.0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/eBay" rel="tag"&gt;eBay&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Napster" rel="tag"&gt;Napster&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Zopa" rel="tag"&gt;Zopa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/21/chomsky_and_the_philosophy_of_the_intern/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>The net, peer to peer technologies like <a href="http://www.napster.com/">Napster</a> and <a href="http://www.bittorrent.com/">BitTorrent</a>, social networking, blogging, podcasting, <a href="http://www.ebay.co.uk">eBay</a>, <a href="http://www.gumtree.com">classifieds</a>, <a href="http://www.zopa.com">zopa</a>. They don't just destroy old industries and ways of doing things from a commercial perspective, they break down the controlled, centralised 1950s ways of thinking.  This culture has been dominated in the last 50 years by (in most western countries) a national media lacking in diversity, an apathetic and materialistic middle class and governments often more beholden to corporations and political donors than voters.  </p>
	<p>But the net starts to break this down.  Witness the rumblings about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan or US elections.  Witness the breadth of "news media" replacement perspectives on the <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/London+Bomb">London bombings</a> reported in blogs and through passers-by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/bomb/pool/">taking pictures</a> on their mobile phones.</p>
	<p>In this vein, I was struck how some of what <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky">Noam Chomsky</a> had to say on propaganda and the limits of freedom of expression in the west could apply to the (past, present and) future of the net, while reading <a href="http://www.chomsky.info/">some of his old essays</a> on the <a href="http://www.icelandair.com">plane</a> while on vacation.  This stuff was written in 1970, much of it in response to the Cold War, but is just as true today:</p>
	<p>"We have, perhaps, reached a point in history when it is possible to think seriously about a society in which freely constituted social bonds replace the fetters of autocratic institutions ...</p>
	<p>Predatory capitalism created a complex industrial system and an advanced technology; it permitted a considerable extension of democratic practice and fostered certain liberal values, but within limits that are now being pressed and must be overcome.  It is not a fit system for the mid-twentieth century.  It is incapable of meeting human needs that can be expressed only in collective terms, and its concept of a competitive man who seeks only to maximize wealth and power, who subjects himself to market relationships, to exploitation and external authority, is antihuman and intolerable in the deepest sense.</p>
	<p>An autocratic state is no acceptable substitute; nor can the militarized state capitalism evolving in the United States or the bureaucratized, centralized welfare state be accepted as the goal of human existence ...</p>
	<p>Modern science and technology can relieve people of the necessity for specialized, imbecile labor.  They may, in principle, provide the basis for a rational social order based on free association and democratic control, if we have the will to create it."<br>
<i>Language and Freedom, 1970</i></p>
	<p>You have to remember that I was in rainy <a href="http://www.dougandkim.co.uk/photos/iceland.html">Iceland</a>, denied pretty much all access to the net and therefore forced to read a real book for a change: very productive!  Maybe this should happen more often.</p>
	<p>A philosophical grounding for web 2.0?  Viva the revolution (or is it the evolution)!</p>
	<p><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Chomsky" rel="tag">Chomsky</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web2.0" rel="tag">web2.0</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/web 2.0" rel="tag">web 2.0</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/eBay" rel="tag">eBay</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Napster" rel="tag">Napster</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Zopa" rel="tag">Zopa</a></p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/21/chomsky_and_the_philosophy_of_the_intern/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/11/rightmove_to_ipo/"><default:title>Rightmove to IPO?</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/11/rightmove_to_ipo/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2005-08-11T22:08:38+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rightmove.co.uk"&gt;Rightmove&lt;/a&gt;, the UK property classifieds site is getting ready for an IPO, and today news broke that they've appointed &lt;a href="http://www.ubs.com/"&gt;UBS&lt;/a&gt; to advise them.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;A few weeks back, it was reported that rightmove had hired &lt;a href="http://www.estateagencynews.co.uk/news/current/news-0805f.html"&gt;Scott Forbes&lt;/a&gt;, former European MD of Cendant, as Chairman to help them get ready to list.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;The valuation being &lt;a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9064-1729374,00.html"&gt;bandied about&lt;/a&gt; is £150 Million.  Pretty steep for a company with only around &lt;a href="http://www.countrywideplc.co.uk/uploaded_photos/reports/AnalystsPresentationSlidesNoPLacing5mar2005.pdf"&gt;£9M in 2004 turnover and £3M in earnings&lt;/a&gt;, although some have been muttering things about £10M in earnings this year.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Rightmove is owned by a bunch of the entrenched estate agency chains: &lt;a href="http://www.countrywideplc.co.uk"&gt;Countrywide&lt;/a&gt; owns 30 per cent of Rightmove. &lt;a href="http://www.hbosplc.com/"&gt;HBOS&lt;/a&gt;, the banking group that owns the Halifax mortgage lender, and &lt;a href="http://www.connells.co.uk/"&gt;Connells&lt;/a&gt;, part-owned by the Skipton Building Society, also own 30 per cent stakes. The remaining 10 per cent is held by &lt;a href="http://www.royalsunalliance.com"&gt;Royal &amp; Sun Alliance&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Rightmove is &lt;a href="http://www.estateagencynews.co.uk/columnists/goodman_articles/mgood1204.html"&gt;worth more than&lt;/a&gt; Countrywide, in fact, Countrywide's 30% stake may be worth more than the rest of its business.  This is the future of estate agency, the crown jewels.  So why sell?  Maybe the partners can't get along.  Maybe they're hungry for short-term cash.  Maybe they believe the business is worth more without them.  Maybe they don't have much confidence in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Rightmove has bet around £15M of investment in Home Information Packs, which the government's been trying to bring in to get buyers and sellers to agree things more quickly with less costs.  But there's a lot of objections to these, and it's by no means sure they'll happen or that Rightmove are the people to facilitate.  There are plenty of companies already looking at HIPs - try a &lt;a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hs=0wc&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=home+information+packs&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta="&gt;Google search&lt;/a&gt; if you don't believe me.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Rightmove is "number one", with around 70% of all properties for sale listed on their site.  But if you look at their web traffic, site speed / usability and local regions, the picture is not so rosy.  Rentals is by no means their sole domain, their site is very poorly optimised for Search Engines, while &lt;a href="http://www.findaproperty.com"&gt;Findaproperty&lt;/a&gt; is becoming the default site in the important London market.  Vertical search aggregators like &lt;a href="http://www.wheresmyproperty.com"&gt;Wheresmyproperty&lt;/a&gt; and local classifieds like &lt;a href="http://www.gumtree.com"&gt;Gumtree&lt;/a&gt; could be a nasty threat.  &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;It's a competitive business, and their ability to get thousands of agents, many of which are owned by their parents, to pay a mere £130 per month each to list all their properties (compared to the thousands being spent on local newspapers) is a nice start but they are by no means sure winners in this space nor immune to price competition.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Watch out for a fun IPO, though, it's nice to see British dotcoms in fashion again!&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/rightmove" rel="tag"&gt;rightmove&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/ipo" rel="tag"&gt;ipo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/classifieds" rel="tag"&gt;classifieds&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/estate agents" rel="tag"&gt;estate agents&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/11/rightmove_to_ipo/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.rightmove.co.uk">Rightmove</a>, the UK property classifieds site is getting ready for an IPO, and today news broke that they've appointed <a href="http://www.ubs.com/">UBS</a> to advise them.</p>
	<p>A few weeks back, it was reported that rightmove had hired <a href="http://www.estateagencynews.co.uk/news/current/news-0805f.html">Scott Forbes</a>, former European MD of Cendant, as Chairman to help them get ready to list.</p>
	<p>The valuation being <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9064-1729374,00.html">bandied about</a> is £150 Million.  Pretty steep for a company with only around <a href="http://www.countrywideplc.co.uk/uploaded_photos/reports/AnalystsPresentationSlidesNoPLacing5mar2005.pdf">£9M in 2004 turnover and £3M in earnings</a>, although some have been muttering things about £10M in earnings this year.</p>
	<p>Rightmove is owned by a bunch of the entrenched estate agency chains: <a href="http://www.countrywideplc.co.uk">Countrywide</a> owns 30 per cent of Rightmove. <a href="http://www.hbosplc.com/">HBOS</a>, the banking group that owns the Halifax mortgage lender, and <a href="http://www.connells.co.uk/">Connells</a>, part-owned by the Skipton Building Society, also own 30 per cent stakes. The remaining 10 per cent is held by <a href="http://www.royalsunalliance.com">Royal & Sun Alliance</a>.</p>
	<p>Rightmove is <a href="http://www.estateagencynews.co.uk/columnists/goodman_articles/mgood1204.html">worth more than</a> Countrywide, in fact, Countrywide's 30% stake may be worth more than the rest of its business.  This is the future of estate agency, the crown jewels.  So why sell?  Maybe the partners can't get along.  Maybe they're hungry for short-term cash.  Maybe they believe the business is worth more without them.  Maybe they don't have much confidence in the future.</p>
	<p>Rightmove has bet around £15M of investment in Home Information Packs, which the government's been trying to bring in to get buyers and sellers to agree things more quickly with less costs.  But there's a lot of objections to these, and it's by no means sure they'll happen or that Rightmove are the people to facilitate.  There are plenty of companies already looking at HIPs - try a <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hs=0wc&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=home+information+packs&btnG=Search&meta=">Google search</a> if you don't believe me.</p>
	<p>Rightmove is "number one", with around 70% of all properties for sale listed on their site.  But if you look at their web traffic, site speed / usability and local regions, the picture is not so rosy.  Rentals is by no means their sole domain, their site is very poorly optimised for Search Engines, while <a href="http://www.findaproperty.com">Findaproperty</a> is becoming the default site in the important London market.  Vertical search aggregators like <a href="http://www.wheresmyproperty.com">Wheresmyproperty</a> and local classifieds like <a href="http://www.gumtree.com">Gumtree</a> could be a nasty threat.  </p>
	<p>It's a competitive business, and their ability to get thousands of agents, many of which are owned by their parents, to pay a mere £130 per month each to list all their properties (compared to the thousands being spent on local newspapers) is a nice start but they are by no means sure winners in this space nor immune to price competition.</p>
	<p>Watch out for a fun IPO, though, it's nice to see British dotcoms in fashion again!</p>
	<p><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/rightmove" rel="tag">rightmove</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/ipo" rel="tag">ipo</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/classifieds" rel="tag">classifieds</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/estate agents" rel="tag">estate agents</a>
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/11/rightmove_to_ipo/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/09/ny_times_to_invest_in_indeed_com/"><default:title>NY Times to invest in indeed.com</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/09/ny_times_to_invest_in_indeed_com/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2005-08-09T23:21:38+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;New York Times &lt;a href="http://www.indeed.com/pressrel/nytimes-indeed.html"&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; today an investment in &lt;a href="http://www.indeed.com"&gt;indeed.com&lt;/a&gt;, in my opinion the very best of the vertical search players, an aggregator of job listings.  Very timely given &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/main/index.php/dougall/2005/08/07/vertical_search_aggregators_shaking_up_t"&gt;our post on this subject&lt;/a&gt; on Sunday.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Founded in 2004 by Paul Forster and Rony Kahan, Indeed crawls listings from job sites as well as classifieds and returns the results in a Google-style simple search; you then click through from the listings to the original site.  They've raised $5M from The New York Times Company, Union Square Ventures and Allen &amp; Company.  Where's the return gonna come from?  Pay-per-click or even the advent of the pay-per-CV model!?&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Fascinating insight into the investment and where it came from in VC Fred Wilson's blog &lt;a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2005/08/indeed.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;NYT has spotted an opportunity to capture back some of the ground lost to online job sites like Monster.  If was &lt;a href="http://www.monster.com"&gt;monster&lt;/a&gt; and hotjobs, careerbuilder I'd be worried &lt;i&gt;indeed&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/indeed.com" rel="tag"&gt;indeed.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/jobs" rel="tag"&gt;jobs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/search" rel="tag"&gt;search&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/09/ny_times_to_invest_in_indeed_com/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>New York Times <a href="http://www.indeed.com/pressrel/nytimes-indeed.html">announced</a> today an investment in <a href="http://www.indeed.com">indeed.com</a>, in my opinion the very best of the vertical search players, an aggregator of job listings.  Very timely given <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/main/index.php/dougall/2005/08/07/vertical_search_aggregators_shaking_up_t">our post on this subject</a> on Sunday.</p>
	<p>Founded in 2004 by Paul Forster and Rony Kahan, Indeed crawls listings from job sites as well as classifieds and returns the results in a Google-style simple search; you then click through from the listings to the original site.  They've raised $5M from The New York Times Company, Union Square Ventures and Allen & Company.  Where's the return gonna come from?  Pay-per-click or even the advent of the pay-per-CV model!?</p>
	<p>Fascinating insight into the investment and where it came from in VC Fred Wilson's blog <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2005/08/indeed.html">here</a></p>
	<p>NYT has spotted an opportunity to capture back some of the ground lost to online job sites like Monster.  If was <a href="http://www.monster.com">monster</a> and hotjobs, careerbuilder I'd be worried <i>indeed</i>.</p>
	<p><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/indeed.com" rel="tag">indeed.com</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/jobs" rel="tag">jobs</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/search" rel="tag">search</a>
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/09/ny_times_to_invest_in_indeed_com/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/09/meetroduction_to_be_bought_by_google/"><default:title>Meetroduction to be bought by Google?</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/09/meetroduction_to_be_bought_by_google/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2005-08-09T18:49:59+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.meetro.com"&gt;Meetroduction&lt;/a&gt;, Chicago social networking start-up with only &lt;a href="http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/1987"&gt;2000 users&lt;/a&gt;, looks set to be bought by Google according to &lt;a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3525986"&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt;.  Meetro makes local community connections through location-based Instant Messenging applications.  Lucky millionaires-to-be if true are &lt;a href="http://www.mobygames.com/developer/sheet/view/developerId,68259/"&gt;game programmer&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/user/view/e_spkr/2246"&gt;Paul Bragiel&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.zephyrsyndicate.com/"&gt;Wendell Davis&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Meetroduction looks like a pretty teensy Chicago start-up, founded in Oct 2004 by 2 guys with some cool tech.  It describes itself as "a gathering of visionaries, programmers and status-quo-upsetters who have their collective eyes on the next generation (and the next, and the next) of communications software"  See more &lt;a href="http://www.meetro.com/corporate.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;If true, this would be Google's first foray into instant messenging, but they've been rumoured to be heading that way for a while, and the mind goboggles at the theoretical applications if you connect this with maps, blogger, my Google etc etc&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;I'm not so sure whether IM and social networking are yet core to Google's strategy.  AOL, MSN and Yahoo do IM pretty well.  &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.friendster.com/"&gt;friendster&lt;/a&gt; amongst thousands of others (and blogs) do social networking pretty well.  But Meet sounds like a funky application and Google has the traffic and reputation to make it happen if they focus on it.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/meetroduction" rel="tag"&gt;meetroduction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/google" rel="tag"&gt;google&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/09/meetroduction_to_be_bought_by_google/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.meetro.com">Meetroduction</a>, Chicago social networking start-up with only <a href="http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/1987">2000 users</a>, looks set to be bought by Google according to <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3525986">reports</a>.  Meetro makes local community connections through location-based Instant Messenging applications.  Lucky millionaires-to-be if true are <a href="http://www.mobygames.com/developer/sheet/view/developerId,68259/">game programmer</a> <a href="http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/user/view/e_spkr/2246">Paul Bragiel</a> and <a href="http://www.zephyrsyndicate.com/">Wendell Davis</a>.</p>
	<p>Meetroduction looks like a pretty teensy Chicago start-up, founded in Oct 2004 by 2 guys with some cool tech.  It describes itself as "a gathering of visionaries, programmers and status-quo-upsetters who have their collective eyes on the next generation (and the next, and the next) of communications software"  See more <a href="http://www.meetro.com/corporate.html">here</a>.</p>
	<p>If true, this would be Google's first foray into instant messenging, but they've been rumoured to be heading that way for a while, and the mind goboggles at the theoretical applications if you connect this with maps, blogger, my Google etc etc</p>
	<p>I'm not so sure whether IM and social networking are yet core to Google's strategy.  AOL, MSN and Yahoo do IM pretty well.  <a href="http://del.icio.us">del.icio.us</a> and <a href="http://www.friendster.com/">friendster</a> amongst thousands of others (and blogs) do social networking pretty well.  But Meet sounds like a funky application and Google has the traffic and reputation to make it happen if they focus on it.</p>
	<p><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/meetroduction" rel="tag">meetroduction</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/google" rel="tag">google</a></p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/09/meetroduction_to_be_bought_by_google/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/07/vertical_search_aggregators_shaking_up_t/"><default:title>"Vertical Search Aggregators" shaking up the UK web</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/07/vertical_search_aggregators_shaking_up_t/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2005-08-07T15:15:45+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;I was lucky enough to have lunch on Friday with an old mate of mine who's over visiting from California where he works for &lt;a href="http://www.ea.com"&gt;Electronic Arts&lt;/a&gt; making cool games.  We went to a nice Thai place in Richmond.  OK, OK, get to the point Dougall.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;It turns out that his brother runs a UK real estate search site called &lt;a href="http://www.wheresmyproperty.com/"&gt;wheresmyproperty.com&lt;/a&gt;.  He spiders all the real estate content out there, tags it and aggregates it in once place.  So instead of searching say findaproperty, primelocation and rightmove, you can get it all in one place, then click through for more details.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://data1.blog.de/blog/d/dougall/img/wheresmyproperty.JPG" title="Screenshot of wheres my property"&gt;&lt;img src="http://data1.blog.de/blog/d/dougall/img/wheresmyproperty_small.jpg" border="0" alt="Screenshot of wheres my property"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;This is a big trend.  In the US, &lt;a href="http://www.indeed.com"&gt;indeed.com&lt;/a&gt; is doing this amazingly well in jobs, as well as &lt;a href="http://www.simplyhired.com"&gt;simplyhired&lt;/a&gt; who just raised another VC round.  Using RSS and spidering, people are aggregating content from lots of providers.  Not only is all the info in one place, the tagging process can improve the speed of search and the attributes available; I find it easier to search monster's listings through indeed than i do on monster itself.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.oodle.com"&gt;Oodle.com&lt;/a&gt; is another US example, but pulling together several verticals in a local model (an aggregated &lt;a href="http://www.gumtree.com"&gt;gumtree&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://www.craigslist.org"&gt;craigslist&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;With the right tagging, the right search experience for your vertical and the right search engine optimisation to get masses of traffic, these sites could well become destinations in their own right.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Although the wave has started with sites like &lt;a href="http://www.wheresmyproperty.com/"&gt;wheresmyproperty&lt;/a&gt; in real estate and &lt;a href="http://www.clickajob.co.uk/"&gt;clickajob&lt;/a&gt; in jobs, this market's still wide open in the UK.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;The big questions ahead are: &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;1) Is this spidering and feed aggregation currently / in future open to legal challenge, for example under copyright law?&lt;br&gt;
2) Can / will the Monsters of the world stop their content from being syndicated / aggregated (or do they need the traffic too much)?&lt;br&gt;
3) How does it all get monetised and how does the revenue get shared?&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;What d'ya think?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/07/vertical_search_aggregators_shaking_up_t/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>I was lucky enough to have lunch on Friday with an old mate of mine who's over visiting from California where he works for <a href="http://www.ea.com">Electronic Arts</a> making cool games.  We went to a nice Thai place in Richmond.  OK, OK, get to the point Dougall.</p>
	<p>It turns out that his brother runs a UK real estate search site called <a href="http://www.wheresmyproperty.com/">wheresmyproperty.com</a>.  He spiders all the real estate content out there, tags it and aggregates it in once place.  So instead of searching say findaproperty, primelocation and rightmove, you can get it all in one place, then click through for more details.</p>
	<p><a href="http://data1.blog.de/blog/d/dougall/img/wheresmyproperty.JPG" title="Screenshot of wheres my property"><img src="http://data1.blog.de/blog/d/dougall/img/wheresmyproperty_small.jpg" border="0" alt="Screenshot of wheres my property"></a></p>
	<p>This is a big trend.  In the US, <a href="http://www.indeed.com">indeed.com</a> is doing this amazingly well in jobs, as well as <a href="http://www.simplyhired.com">simplyhired</a> who just raised another VC round.  Using RSS and spidering, people are aggregating content from lots of providers.  Not only is all the info in one place, the tagging process can improve the speed of search and the attributes available; I find it easier to search monster's listings through indeed than i do on monster itself.</p>
	<p><a href="http://www.oodle.com">Oodle.com</a> is another US example, but pulling together several verticals in a local model (an aggregated <a href="http://www.gumtree.com">gumtree</a> or <a href="http://www.craigslist.org">craigslist</a>).</p>
	<p>With the right tagging, the right search experience for your vertical and the right search engine optimisation to get masses of traffic, these sites could well become destinations in their own right.</p>
	<p>Although the wave has started with sites like <a href="http://www.wheresmyproperty.com/">wheresmyproperty</a> in real estate and <a href="http://www.clickajob.co.uk/">clickajob</a> in jobs, this market's still wide open in the UK.</p>
	<p>The big questions ahead are: </p>
	<p>1) Is this spidering and feed aggregation currently / in future open to legal challenge, for example under copyright law?<br>
2) Can / will the Monsters of the world stop their content from being syndicated / aggregated (or do they need the traffic too much)?<br>
3) How does it all get monetised and how does the revenue get shared?</p>
	<p>What d'ya think?</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/07/vertical_search_aggregators_shaking_up_t/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/06/logogle_google_the_mind_goggles/"><default:title>Logogle Google; the mind Goggles</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/06/logogle_google_the_mind_goggles/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2005-08-06T10:59:08+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Have you seen this fun Google-font add-on?  You can make "Google" say whatever you want in the google font at &lt;a href="http://www.logogle.com"&gt;Logogle&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.geocities.com/dougmonro/logogle.jpg" alt="Irrational Exuberance" title="Logogle"&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Doing the rounds from some Asian blogs to Europe and US, this just shows how hot Google is right now.  Simple interface, monster advertising model and revenue growth.  Google Earth's hot too.  &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Everyone's scared of Froogle, payments, maps, classifieds, browser etc etc.  They've stolen top talent from all over Silicon Valley.  An amazing young innovative company, but they will hit bumps soon.  Times will change methinks.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Google" rel="tag"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/06/logogle_google_the_mind_goggles/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.</p>
	<p>Have you seen this fun Google-font add-on?  You can make "Google" say whatever you want in the google font at <a href="http://www.logogle.com">Logogle</a>...</p>
	<p><img src="http://www.geocities.com/dougmonro/logogle.jpg" alt="Irrational Exuberance" title="Logogle"><br>
</p>
	<p>Doing the rounds from some Asian blogs to Europe and US, this just shows how hot Google is right now.  Simple interface, monster advertising model and revenue growth.  Google Earth's hot too.  </p>
	<p>Everyone's scared of Froogle, payments, maps, classifieds, browser etc etc.  They've stolen top talent from all over Silicon Valley.  An amazing young innovative company, but they will hit bumps soon.  Times will change methinks.</p>
	<p><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Google" rel="tag">Google</a>
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/06/logogle_google_the_mind_goggles/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/06/welcome_to_future_moocher/"><default:title>Welcome to future moocher</default:title><default:link>http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/06/welcome_to_future_moocher/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2005-08-06T10:25:22+02:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;This is my first post to this new space.  Woo hoo.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Here I'll share a few of my moochings on the future of the net, community, why cats always land on their feet and whatever else seems cool.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;I've worked on various consumer / community websites for the last 6 years or so, including moneybags.co.uk (now defunct) and &lt;a href="http://www.ebay.co.uk"&gt;eBay.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;.  I now help run a local community classifieds site called &lt;a href="http://www.gumtree.com"&gt;gumtree&lt;/a&gt;.  Many Londoners may know it already, if you don't check it out and tell your friends.  You can find all sorts of useful and weird stuff on there.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;I like to edit the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page"&gt;wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; every now and then, and have a few favourite blogs like Tony Gentile's &lt;a href="http://www.buzzhit.com/buzzblog.html"&gt;Buzzhit&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href="http://www.internetstockblog.com/"&gt;Internet Stock Blog&lt;/a&gt;.  Hoping to find a few more future-moochers in the UK so tell &lt;a href="http://www.dougandkim.co.uk"&gt;me&lt;/a&gt; if you spot some.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;I'm a Londoner by heart and soul and am back there now though have lived in variously Manchester, Bath, Cambridge, Sydney, Chicago, Redhill over the last 10 years and loved em all.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/gumtree" rel="tag"&gt;gumtree&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/London" rel="tag"&gt;London&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tag/community" rel="tag"&gt;community&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/06/welcome_to_future_moocher/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>This is my first post to this new space.  Woo hoo.</p>
	<p>Here I'll share a few of my moochings on the future of the net, community, why cats always land on their feet and whatever else seems cool.</p>
	<p>I've worked on various consumer / community websites for the last 6 years or so, including moneybags.co.uk (now defunct) and <a href="http://www.ebay.co.uk">eBay.co.uk</a>.  I now help run a local community classifieds site called <a href="http://www.gumtree.com">gumtree</a>.  Many Londoners may know it already, if you don't check it out and tell your friends.  You can find all sorts of useful and weird stuff on there.</p>
	<p>I like to edit the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page">wikipedia</a> every now and then, and have a few favourite blogs like Tony Gentile's <a href="http://www.buzzhit.com/buzzblog.html">Buzzhit</a> and the <a href="http://www.internetstockblog.com/">Internet Stock Blog</a>.  Hoping to find a few more future-moochers in the UK so tell <a href="http://www.dougandkim.co.uk">me</a> if you spot some.</p>
	<p>I'm a Londoner by heart and soul and am back there now though have lived in variously Manchester, Bath, Cambridge, Sydney, Chicago, Redhill over the last 10 years and loved em all.</p>
	<p><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/gumtree" rel="tag">gumtree</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/London" rel="tag">London</a><br>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/community" rel="tag">community</a></p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://dougall.blog.co.uk/2005/08/06/welcome_to_future_moocher/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item></rdf:RDF>
